Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
J. bras. pneumol ; 47(4): e20200577, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286954

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Work-related asthma (WRA) is highly prevalent in the adult population. WRA includes occupational asthma (OA), which is asthma caused by workplace exposures, and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA), also known as work-aggravated asthma, which is preexisting or concurrent asthma worsened by workplace conditions. In adults, the estimated prevalence of OA is 16.0%, whereas that of WEA is 21.5%. An increasing number of chemicals used in industrial production, households, and services are associated with the incidence of adult-onset asthma attributable to exposure to chemicals. This review article summarizes the different types of WRA and describes diagnostic procedures, treatment, prevention, and approaches to patient management. It is not always easy to distinguish between OA and WEA. It is important to establish a diagnosis (of sensitizer-/irritant-induced OA or WEA) in order to prevent worsening of symptoms, as well as to prevent other workers from being exposed, by providing early treatment and counseling on social security and work-related issues.


RESUMO A asma relacionada ao trabalho (ART) é um acometimento com elevada prevalência na população adulta. A ART inclui a asma ocupacional (AO), desencadeada pela exposição a um agente presente em um determinado ambiente de trabalho, e a asma agravada ou exacerbada pelo trabalho (AA/ET), que acomete indivíduos com antecedentes de asma ou que iniciaram um quadro de asma concomitante, mas sem relação causal com o ambiente de trabalho. Estima-se que 16,0% e 21,5% da asma no adulto sejam AO e AA/ET, respectivamente. O elevado e crescente número de substâncias químicas usadas na produção industrial, no uso domiciliar ou em serviços é responsável pela incidência de asma associada à exposição a agentes químicos na vida adulta. Este artigo de revisão descreve os principais tipos de ART, os procedimentos para seu diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção e as condutas frente ao diagnóstico. Nem sempre é fácil a distinção entre AO e AA/ET. A importância do diagnóstico (AO ou AA/ET e asma induzida por sensibilizantes ou irritantes) tem relação com a adoção de medidas de prevenção para evitar que novos indivíduos sejam expostos e que os acometidos apresentem agravamento da doença, utilizando tratamento precoce e fornecendo orientação sobre aspectos previdenciários e trabalhistas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Asthma, Occupational/diagnosis , Asthma, Occupational/etiology , Asthma, Occupational/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence
2.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 32(2): 113-118, jun. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-795887

ABSTRACT

Wheat flour is a known sensitizer for humans. Bakers exposed to flour dust may develop occupational rhinitis and asthma. In Chile there is no current permissible limit for occupational exposure to wheat flour. To propose such a limit, 9 bakeries located in 6 districts of Santiago de Chile were evaluated, 6 bakeries were semi-industrial and 3 were small business. Twenty-eight environmental personal samples were obtained by standard sampling methods and they were analyzed at the Institute of Public Health of Chile. No significant differences were found (p = 0,2915, Kruskall-Wallis' test) between air concentrations of flour particles in the working environment of semi-industrial (geometric mean: MG = 0.88 mg/m³,geometric deviation: DEG = 2,68) and small business (MG = 1.39 mg/m³, DEG = 2,31). A permissible limit of wheat flour dust exposure is recommended.


Se conoce que la harina de trigo es un sensibilizador en seres humanos. Los panaderos expuestos a polvo de harina pueden desarrollar rinitis y asma ocupacional. En Chile actualmente no existe un límite permisible para la exposición ocupacional a polvo de harina. Con el objetivo de proponer un límite, fueron evaluadas 9 panaderías de 6 comunas de Santiago de Chile, de las cuales 6 fueron semi-industriales y 3 pequeñas. Un total de veintiocho muestras personales de aire fueron obtenidas según método estándar de muestreo y analizadas en el Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile. No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p = 0,2915, prueba de Kruskall-Wallis) en la concentración de partículas de harina en el ambiente de trabajo semi-industrial (media geométrica: MG = 0,88 mg/m³, desviación geométrica: DEG = 2,68) y en el de panaderías pequeñas (MG = 1,39 mg/m³, DEG = 2,31). En base a las observaciones realizadas se recomienda establecer un límite permisible de exposición para polvo de harina de trigo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Powders/analysis , Allergens/analysis , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Asthma, Occupational/etiology , Flour/analysis , Food Industry , Chile , Occupational Exposure/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL